Nuremberg 2
I offer the following post for your information and interest only with regards to the action taken across the world to legally challenge the Covid fraud and government tyranny.
I have previously posted a ‘disclaimer’ in some of my previous posts related to this Covid scam which reads as follows:
Disclaimer:
The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za is not a qualified doctor or a medical professional. I am also neither an activist or a protestor of any sort and will neither organise, promote or participate in any protest action (my reason for this will be explained in the final post of this series).
My interest is purely that of Biblical Prophetic interpretation. I have no earthly allegiance to any governmental powers or opposing parties/organisations.
My Kingdom affiliation is not of this world.
The information contained on this site is for your consideration and your further research. The information is intended to broaden the horizons of the reader and to expose him/her to information that is not talked about or even considered in the mainstream media. Viewpoints are not forced upon any reader. You, the reader, are trusted to discern for yourself while browsing the pages of this website, what is true and untrue.
The author of Unleavenedbread.co.za does not necessarily agree with, support, or endorse everything that is posted, or linked to on any of our pages. Viewpoints expressed in some articles posted on this site do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the author of this website.
The reason for my anti-activist or anti-resistance stance is due to the fact that I believe what is taking place in the world today with regards to this scam plandemic is part of prophesied end time Biblical events. I believe that what we are witnessing is the rise of the end-time Babylonian world empire as foreshadowed in the book of Genesis with Nimrod’s Tower of Babel.
King Solomon said in the book of Ecclesiastes 1:9 ‘ The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun’
This final world empire is described in the books of Daniel and Revelation as the ten toes or ten horns of the beast. This final world empire is mans evil attempt to grasp dominion over the whole of humanity in rebellion against the Almighty Creator who had, in the Genesis account, destroyed this type of ‘collective’, godless rulership and dispersed the people acorss the world.
We witness through the lives of Joseph, Daniel and our Messiah Yahushua that they did not resist the governmental powers during their time and in fact Yahushua rebuked Peter for attempting to interfere in the Divine plan of the Almighty. We read of this event in Matthew 16:
21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day. 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
Again in John 18 we read how Peter took it upon himself to interfere with divine destiny:
10 Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest’s servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus. 11 Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?
We must learn the lesson from these accounts and understand that our Heavenly Father uses the wicked rulers of this world for His purposes and often to chastise His people and draw them back, though persecution and trials, to Him.
The Almighty even called the tyrant Nebuchadnezzar His ‘servant’ in Jeremiah 27:6 and 43:10. This was because Nebuchadnezzar was used to serve the Almighty’s overall and greater purpose. However, when this purpose was completed; Nebuchadnezzar was brought down. The same will happen to this final world empire when the divine timing and plan reaches the fullness of time. This is foretold in Revelation:
And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.
Revelation 14:8
And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
Revelation 18:2
For those Christians who believe that they must fight the battle for justice on behalf of the Almighty please bear the following verse in mind:
‘For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.’
Revelation 17:17
‘For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will’
It could be that your self-righteous actions are in direct conflict with the will and divine plan of the Almighty Father. When we come across a verse with a double numerical reference, in this case 17:17, this should draw special attention to what is being stated.
As faithful believers we must stand firm in faith, adhere to the Biblical commandments and continue to be a light to the nations. This is all that we are required to do. The wise man Solomon put it to us this way:
Ecclisiastes 12:13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
Having stated the above, I must clarify that like Daniel, there is a line that I will not cross in terms of following the Covid rules and regulations. I will not participate in the supposed vaccine program at all. What is fraudulantly called a Covid vaccine is not a vaccine by definition. Or at least according to the definition before the CDC changed it to allign with this Covid jab.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention modified its definition of the words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website. Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html#storylink=cpy
It was traditionally explained that a small sample of the virus would have been included in the vaccine to enable the body to build up aantiboied against the weakened/smaller viral load. In this way the body would be able and ready to ward off a greater attack from the same virus. This is however not the case with the covid virus as this virus has never been identified and isolated in terms of Koch’s postualtes. Koch’s postulates are four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease.
Koch’s Postulates
Developed in the 19th century, Robert Koch’s postulates are the four criteria designed to assess whether a microorganism causes a disease. As originally stated, the four criteria are:
(1) The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals;
(2) The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual;
(3) Inoculation of a healthy individual with the cultured microorganism must recapitulated the disease; and finally
(4) The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased individual and matched to the original microorganism.
Koch’s postulates have been critically important in establishing the criteria whereby the scientific community agrees that a microorganism causes a disease. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775492/
‘Koch’s postulates’ was never followed in the Covid pandemic process. ‘If you have worked your way through my ‘Babylon Rising’ series you will also understand that no virus has ever satisfied Koch’s postulates because viruses are not the cause of disease. It is all a lot of voodoo science. Anyway here is another ‘traditional’ definition of a vaccine:
Vaccination: Injection of a killed microbe in order to stimulate the immune system against the microbe, thereby preventing disease. Vaccinations, or immunizations, work by stimulating the immune system, the natural disease-fighting system of the body. The healthy immune system is able to recognize invading bacteria and viruses and produce substances (antibodies) to destroy or disable them. Immunizations prepare the immune system to ward off a disease. To immunize against viral diseases, the virus used in the vaccine has been weakened or killed. https://www.medicinenet.com/vaccination/definition.htm
We are told that the Covid ‘vaccine’ neither protects you from the virus or prevents you from spreading it. It is useless. The Covid jab is an experimental gene therapy injectable and a sinister one at that. I do not believe that our Heavenly Father would condone anyone taking a vaccine. Science and the medical professionhas become a ‘god’ in this world with many Christians putting all their faith in it. I believe that ‘science’ is the new global religion that the ‘globalists’ want everyone to submit to in a form of reverence and worship.
How often have you heard it proclaimed from the mouths of the medical, scientific and political leaders that we must ‘listen to the science’ and ‘follow the science’?
Well, as for me, I listen to my Heavenly Father through His Word and I follow my Messiah Yahushua. The Creator of the universe is my God whom I listen to and I follow His Son.
My ‘god’ is not science.
As for wearing a mask, it is very seldom that I wear one as I resist places that require me to put one on. I do however wear one for very short intervals every now and then even though I understand that they are more detrimental to one’s health and reflect ones obedience to the rulers rather than provide any safety from a non-existent contagion.
Although we must expose evil (Ephesians 5:11) and not participate in any way with this evil plot, we must not assume that it is our duty to wage war against the evil rulers and ungodly practices in this world. Justice and righteousness will only return and prevail in this world when the allotted time arrives and the Sovereign Father rules through His Son – Yahushua.
I believe that we are now very close to this time which is the seventh and final day or the seven thousandth year period i.e. the Millennium reign of the Messiah.
Until then I will continue to watch the signs with keen interest and will try my very best to wait patiently.
‘And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove* them’.
Ephesians 5:11 (KJV)
s*(expose, bring to the light)
There are however many moral and upstanding citizens across the world who have decided not to sit back and who have taken it upon themselves to challenge this global tyranny through the legal courts, albeit a newly established ‘fit for purpose’ legal council – ‘Nuremberg 2’.
This post provides some insight into who is behind this legal challenge and the progress made so far.
History
What were the Nuremberg Trials
After the second world war, Allied powers—United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union—came together to form the International Military Tribunal (IMT). From 1945 to 1946, Nazi Germany leaders stood trial for crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes.
APPOINTING THE COURT
In the days before Germany surrendered on May 8, 1945, President Harry S Truman appointed Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H Jackson to be the chief prosecutor representing the United States in the proposed trials for the European Axis powers. Jackson helped lead the Allies—American, British, French, and Soviet governments—to an agreement called the London Charter,setting the procedures for the Nuremberg Trials. The London Agreement created the International Military Tribunal (IMT) on August 8, 1945, where each of the four Allied nations appointed a judge and a prosecution team.
Lord Justice Geoffrey Lawrence of Great Britain would serve as the court’s presiding judge. The proceedings would be simultaneously translated into English, French, German, and Russian. The trial would make history being the first of its kind with judges from four countries.
NUREMBERG, GERMANY
During the Moscow Conference on October 30, 1943, the Declaration of Atrocities was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin stating:
“The United Kingdom, the United States and the Soviet Union have received from many quarters evidence of atrocities, massacres and cold-blooded mass executions which are being perpetrated by Hitlerite forces in many of the countries they have overrun . . . those German officers and men and members of the Nazi party who have been responsible for or have taken a consenting part in the above atrocities, massacres and executions will be sent back to the countries in which their abominable deeds were done in order that they may be judged and punished according to the laws of these liberated countries and of free governments which will be erected therein…”
Nuremberg, Germany was chosen as the location of the trials for being a focal point of Nazi propaganda rallies leading up to the war. The Allies wanted Nuremberg to symbolize the death of Nazi Germany. The court convened in the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg that was previously expanded by German prisoners to fit up to 1,200 detainees.
INDICTMENT
The indictment of 24 Nazi government officials and organizations was filed on October 18, 1945 by the four chief prosecutors of the International Military Tribunal: Robert H Jackson of the United States, Sir Hartley Shawcross of Great Britain, Francois de Menthon of France, and Roman A Rudenko of the Soviet Union. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal included crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The IMT defined crimes against humanity as “murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation…or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds.”
The indictment was read on November 20, 1945 with 21 defendants appearing in court. The suicides of top Nazi leaders such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, and Heinrich Himmler prevented them from standing trial. Head of the German Labor Front, Robert Ley, committed suicide the day before the trial.
THE TRIAL
Between November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946, the Tribunal tried 24 of the most important military and political leaders of the Third Reich and heard evidence against 21 of the defendants. During the trial, the Tribunal—and the world—learned about the the Nazi Party and its “planning, initiating and waging of aggressive war” from the beginning. Footage of Nazi concentration camps taken by Allied military photographers during liberation was shown to the court. The graphic scenes of what had taken place in Europe were the most powerful evidence presented at the trial. Other memorable moments of the trial were the screenings of the Nazi Concentration and Prison Camps and The Nazi Plan films, the detailed description of the Final Solution, the murders of prisoners of war, atrocities in extermination camps, and countless cruel acts to prosecute Jews.
VERDICT AND EXECUTIONS
On October 1, 1946, the Tribunal convicted 19 of the defendants and acquitted three. Of those convicted, 12 were sentenced to death. Three defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and four to prison terms ranging from 10 to 20 years. On October 16, executions were carried out by hanging in the gymnasium of the courthouse. Hermann Göring committed suicide the night before his execution. In 1947, the prisoners sentenced to incarceration were sent to Spandau Prison in Berlin.
SUBSEQUENT NUREMBERG TRIALS
From December 1946 to April 1949, a series of twelve additional military tribunals for war crimes against Nazi Germany leaders were held by the United States in the Palace of Justice. The defendants were 177 high-ranking physicians, judges, industrialists, SS commanders and police commanders, military personnel, civil servants, and diplomats. The trials uncovered the German leadership that supported the Nazi dictatorship. Of the 177 defendants, 24 were sentenced to death, 20 to lifelong imprisonment, and 98 other prison sentences. Twenty five defendants were found not guilty. Many of the prisoners were released early in the 1950s as a result of pardons. Thirteen of the 24 death sentences were executed.
source: https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/topics/nuremberg-trials
10 Standards of the Nuremberg Code
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.
Introduction
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
source: https://edcdeveloper.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/bmj-no-7070-volume-313-the-nuremberg-code.pdf
Nuremberg 2
The greatest Nuremberg of all time is on its way
(NB: translated from German)
17/02/2021
By Jean-Michel Grau
Right now, a second Nuremberg tribunal that is in preparation, with a class action lawsuit being set up under the aegis of thousands of lawyers worldwide behind the American-German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who is prosecuting those responsible for the Covid-19 scandal manipulated by the Davos Forum.
In this respect, it is worth recalling that Reiner Fuellmich is the lawyer who succeeded in condemning the automobile giant Volkswagen in the case of the tampered catalytic converters. And it is this same lawyer who succeeded in condemning Deutsche Bank as a criminal enterprise.
According to Reiner Fuellmich, all the frauds committed by German companies are derisory compared to the damage that the Covid-19 crisis has caused and continues to cause. This Covid-19 crisis should be renamed the “Covid-19 Scandal” and all those responsible should be prosecuted for civil damages due to manipulations and falsified test protocols. Therefore, an international network of business lawyers will plead the biggest tort case of all time, the Covid-19 fraud scandal, which has meanwhile turned into the biggest crime against humanity ever committed.
A Covid-19 commission of enquiry has been set up on the initiative of a group of German lawyers with the aim of bringing an international class action lawsuit using Anglo-Saxon law.
Here is the summarized translation of the last communication of Dr. Fuellmich of 15/02/2021
“The hearings of around 100 internationally renowned scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers, which have been conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 affair since 10.07.2020, have in the meantime shown with a probability close to certainty that the Covid- 19 scandal was at no time a health issue. Rather, it was about solidifying the illegitimate power (illegitimate because it was obtained by criminal methods) of the corrupt “Davos clique” by transferring the wealth of the people to the members of the Davos clique, destroying, among other things, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. Platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc. could thus appropriate their market share and wealth.”
………………………………
According to the Nuremberg Code (1947),
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”
If your employer compels you to take the COVID-19 vaccine, invoke the following statement:
NOTICE: By authority of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation, I do hereby exercise my right to refuse to submit to or to administer the COVID-19 vaccine.
The United States Government has prosecuted, convicted and executed Medical Doctors who have violated the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation.
Aiders and abettors of Nuremberg Crimes are equally guilty and have also been prosecuted, convicted, and executed.
Dr Francis Boyle wrote the US Bio-medical Weapons Treaty > into American Law.
Dr. Francis Boyle wrote the above by mass request of “we the people”
Dr. Francis Boyle wrote the above as an actual Legal Defense for any and all civil attorneys _ to present to the Judge _ to remove any legal demands on the human subject
VIOLATION OF ANY 1 OF THESE 10 NUREMBERG CODES CARRIES A PENALTY OF DEATH.
SO BE IT.
They have violated all 10. If you are seeing this and have been a part of this, EVEN SOMEONE STANDING AT A DOOR TO A FACILITY ENFORCING THE REQUIREMENT A MASK FOR ENTRY ETC. you are guilty. If I have it my way you will hang. I don’t care who you are. I don’t care what our relationship might be. If you are guilty, I will seek the death penalty for you. As far as I am concerned there is no reason or excuse that will save you. You need to die like so many before you. In my mind it is that simple. I will show you NO MERCY. Don’t tell me you were “just doing your job”. Don’t tell me you were “just following orders”. I don’t care if you were ignorant, stupid, lied to, fooled, brainwashed have shit for brains or whatever else you say. If you are guilty, You need to hang.
Source: Greg Reese.
Reiner Füllmich:
Dr Reiner Füllmich is an international trial lawyer who has successfully
sued large fraudulent corporations like Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich will lead over 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 medical specialists
and sue CDC, WHO and Davos Group for crimes against humanity.
Update from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on progress
6th January 2022
Video 1
Dr. Fuellmich provides clear and rational analysis of today’s world wide psychological manipulation applications. CORONA FRAUD SCANDAL CASE.
DR. REINER FUELLMICH
Video 2
International Legal Offensive – Reiner Fuellmich
International Legal Offensive hosted by Reiner Fuellmich and featuring many scientists, professors etc
Video 3
JERM WARFARE INTERVIEWS REINER FUELLMICH
“WE’RE ABOUT TO REACH THE TIPPING POINT”
“I don’t think that all these adverse reactions to the vaccines are part of the plan; they’re trying to rush this thing through, and that’s why so many mistakes are happening.”
The Polish Nuremberg 2 Project
What is the Nuremberg 2.0 project?
The Nuremberg 2.0 project is a civic initiative created from the necessity of the moment and the need of the heart.
What are the goals of the project?
The goal of the project is to activate conscious and responsible Poles to collect historical and legal documentation describing acts of crimes, lawlessness, abuses and omissions of public authority and to document individual tragedies unknown to the wider public today, which you will want to voluntarily share with us.
How are we going to achieve the goals of the project?
We will collect and register documentation and individual legal acts will be prepared to formulate charges and indict specific persons directly or indirectly responsible for the committed crimes. We will also register professional archival documentation and on its basis, we will publish historical journals under the collective name of “Journals Nuremberg 2.0”.
What was the reason for setting up the project?
As a consequence of the decisions of the Polish government, and in particular of the Ministry of Health and its subordinate agencies, many human injustices and grievances were caused and the victims were primarily Poles – citizens of the Republic of Poland.
Where does the name of our project come from?
The Nuremberg 2.0 project recalls the trial known from the history: the National Socialist system of the Third Reich was tried for the crimes committed by those who represented policies and rules implemented by this system . The name of our project is purely symbolic.
Video 4
Poland House of Representatives’ Investigation Committee: inauguration with dr Reiner Füllmich
We cordially invite you to a live broadcast of the first Republic of Poland Members of Parliament Investigation Committee as part of the Nuremberg 2.0 project with the special guest Dr. Reiner Füllmich attendance.
The committee will be led by the Member of Parliament Grzegorz Braun and prof. Mirosław Piotrowski, Paweł Skutecki, attorney Jacek Wilk.
Among other guests attending the committee you can find: attorney Arkadiusz Tetela, attorney Krzysztof Łopatowski and attorney Jarosław Litwin.
About Dr. Reiner Füllmich:
Dr Reiner Füllmich is an international trial lawyer who has successfully
sued large fraudulent corporations like Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich will lead over 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 medical specialists
and sue CDC, WHO and Davos Group for crimes against humanity.
Note: the following is a Youtube video and may therefore be removed at aany time due to their ridiculous ‘violation’ rules.
Video 5
Presented by Doctors for Covid Ethics and hosted by UK Column, the COVID-19 Interdisciplinary Symposium took place on July 29th and 30th. Scroll down for links and time codes.
Session IV: THE HOUR OF JUSTICE with Patrick Henningsen, Reiner Fuellmich, Sucharit Bhakdi, Vera Sharav, and Robert F.Kennedy Jr.
00.00 Reviving the Nuremberg Codex
Conversation with Vera Sharav, Sucharit Bhakdi and Catherine Austin Fitts
17.19 The Hour of Justice
With Reiner Füllmich, Vera Sharav, Patrick Henningsen with a pre-recorded contribution from Robert F.Kennedy Jr.
48.13 https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/aiovg_videos/a-message-of-hope-and-freedom-robert-f-kennedy-jr/
50.38 Final Panel Discussion
with Sucharit Bhakdi, Thomas Binder, Catherine Austin Fitts, Reiner Fuellmich lead by Michael Palmer
2.01.19 Closing Remarks by Sucharit Bhakdi
LAWYER ANNA DE BOUISSERET EXPLAINS WHO WILL BE HELD LIABLE UNDER THE LAW
Video 6
In this brilliant interview, lawyer Anna de Buisseret explains clearly and eloquently how those responsible for causing harm will be held liable under the law in relation to the experimental injections currently being rolled out, especially to young children. She describes how those who have explicitly or implicitly aided and abetted governments in a military grade psychological operation have essentially committed crimes against humanity and that they will inevitably be held accountable, as has happened throughout history.
Grand Jury Proceeding by the Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion
Empowering Public Conscience through Natural Law
‘Injustice to One is an Injustice to All’
We, a group of international lawyers and a judge, hereby are conducting criminal investigation modelled after the United States Grand Jury proceedings.
This Grand Jury Investigation serves as a model legal proceeding to present to a jury (consisting of the citizens of the world) all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders,
organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic.
Crimes to be investigated include all acts performed or omitted by a person in pursuance of a common design to commit Crimes Against Humanity, and all such criminal acts condemned in the various communities of jurors around the world.
This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people and shall be referred to as the ‘Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion.
Having been unable to find a court to hear the actual evidence in the current system´s courts of law, we are undertaking this proceeding outside of the current system and based on natural law.
This, in turn is founded on the firm belief that every person can easily distinguish between good and evil, and between right and wrong.
The allegation is that the world’s governments have come under the controlling influence of corrupt and criminal power structures.
They colluded to stage a pandemic that they had been planning for years. To this end they deliberately created mass panic through false statements of fact and a socially engineered psychological operation whose messages they conveyed through the corporate media.
The purpose of this mass panic was to persuade the population to agree to the so-called “vaccinations” which have in the meantime be proven to be neither effective, nor safe, but extremely dangerous, even lethal.
The economic, social, and health damage that these Crimes Against Humanity have caused to the world’s population can be measured in quadrillions of dollars.
The lawyers listed below, with the assistance of a number of highly respected scientists and experts from around the globe and under the auspices of a judge from Portugal,
will conduct this Grand Jury Investigation and thereby provide the jury (the citizens of the world) with a complete picture of these Crimes Against Humanity.
The ‘Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion´s investigation´s purpose is twofold: On the one hand it is to serve as a model proceeding and get indictments against some of the criminally and civilly responsible figure heads of these Crimes against Humanity.
And on the other hand it is – through showing a complete picture of what we are facing, including the geopolitical and historical backdrop – to create awareness about
the factual collapse of the current, hijacked system and its institutions, and, as a consequence
the necessity for the people themselves retaking their sovereignty, and
the necessity to first stop this plandemic´s measures by refusing to comply, and
the necessity to jump-start their own new system of health care, education, economics and judiciary, so that democracy and the rule of law on the basis of our constitutions will be reestablished.
The Peoples ‘Court of Public Opinion works independent of any government and any non-governmental organization
Logistic support is provided by the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee:
www.corona-ausschuss.de (German),
www.corona-ausschuss.de/en (English),
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5 (Hearings in English)
Telegram (German),
Telegram (English),
Attorney at Law Virginie de Araujo Recchia, France
Judge Rui Fonseca E Castro, Portugal
Attorney at Law Claire Deeks, New Zealand
Attorney at Law Viviane Fischer, Germany
Attorney at Law Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Germany
Attorney at Law N. Ana Garner, USA
Attorney at Law Dr. Renate Holzeisen, Italy
Attorney at Law Tony Nikolic, Australia
Attorney at Law Dipali Ojha, India
Attorney at Law Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt (Adv.), South Africa
Attorney at Law Deana Sacks, USA
Attorney at Law Michael Swinwood, Canada
Cooperating Human Rights Defenders and Legal Activists
Tjaša Vuzem, Slovenia
Gina Cloud, USA
Dr. Cristiane Grieb, Canada
Leslie Manookian, USA
To be added to a list of supporters please contact us at contact@grand-jury.net
https://www.grand-jury.net
Day 1: Opening Session of the Grand Jury Proceeding
2022-02-05
This is the English stream! To the German stream: https://gettr.com/user/coronaausschuss A group of international lawyers and a judge are conducting criminal investigation modelled after Grand Jury proceedings in order to present to the public all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic. More: http://www.grand-jury.net/ Only through your donation the work of the Committee is possible. https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/donate/
The following video below is an extract which is Dr Reiner fuellmich’s opening statement:
